The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is proposing critical updates to its Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD), focusing on neurological conditions and convulsive disorders. The VA posted the proposed changes in November, 2024. These revisions aim to modernize the evaluation criteria for a wide range of conditions, reflecting medical advancements and prioritizing veterans’ real-world experiences. If you’re a veteran looking to stay one step ahead of the changes, this guide has got you covered – we’re talking implications, preparations, and tangible next steps.
Why Is the VA Proposing These Changes?
The VA’s system for evaluating neurological conditions has relied on terminology and standards that haven’t kept pace with advancements in medical science. Many diagnostic codes and definitions are now outdated and fail to capture the current understanding of these conditions. For example, the term “neuritis” is gradually being replaced by “neuropathy,” a more accurate descriptor for nerve-related disorders. The proposed changes aim to modernize the rating process by introducing clear, measurable criteria that reflect the true impact of these disabilities, moving away from the inconsistencies of older, more subjective methods.
Key Highlights of the Proposed Changes
The proposed changes to the VASRD for neurological conditions include adjustments to criteria, rating levels, and evaluation methods for several key disorders:
Epilepsy and Seizure Disorders
- Frequency-Based Ratings: Current ratings for epilepsy largely depend on the frequency of seizures (e.g., generalized tonic-clonic seizures vs. partial seizures). The proposed changes emphasize not only frequency but also the seizure type’s impact on functionality, including work limitations and social engagement challenges.
- Documentation Updates: Veterans may need more detailed evidence of seizure patterns, including medical logs and witness testimony.
Migraines
- Functional Limitations: The VA proposes shifting from assessing the frequency of migraines to evaluating how migraines affect daily activities. This includes examining their severity and impact on employment and personal life.
- Expanded Coverage: Updates may include expanded criteria for secondary conditions like anxiety or depression linked to chronic migraines.
Neurodegenerative Disorders
- Progression Ratings: For diseases like ALS (Lou Gehrig’s Disease) and Parkinson’s, the VA is considering new criteria that better capture disease progression. This could result in more precise ratings for advanced stages of these conditions.
- Early Diagnosis Coverage: Veterans with early signs of neurodegenerative conditions could benefit from clearer guidelines on early-stage ratings.
Other Neurological Conditions
- Sleep Disorders: Certain sleep-related neurological disorders may see updated diagnostic codes to better capture their severity.
- Peripheral Neuropathy: Changes aim to refine how this condition is rated, with an emphasis on differentiating between mild, moderate, and severe cases.
How These Changes Improve the Current System
- Modernized Criteria: By incorporating recent medical insights, the VA ensures that disability ratings reflect current understandings of neurological and convulsive disorders.
- Greater Precision: The updated criteria aim to provide more accurate ratings, ensuring that veterans receive compensation that matches their condition’s real-world impact.
- Increased Inclusivity: Conditions previously overlooked or poorly defined in the VASRD may now receive dedicated diagnostic codes and evaluation standards.
Potential Impacts on Veterans
Positive Outcomes
- Veterans with conditions that significantly impair daily living may see higher ratings, particularly those with severe migraines or progressive neurological diseases.
- The focus on functionality ensures a more comprehensive evaluation of how a condition impacts overall quality of life.
Concerns and Challenges
- Veterans whose conditions have stabilized or whose symptoms are less severe may see reductions in their ratings.
- Documentation requirements could become more stringent, necessitating updated medical evidence and more frequent evaluations.
Steps Veterans Should Take Now
- Review Proposed Changes: Veterans should familiarize themselves with the proposed updates to understand how they might affect their current ratings. The official Federal Register website provides detailed information on these revisions.
- Gather Evidence:
- Maintain updated medical records, including detailed descriptions of symptoms and their impact on daily life.
- Request documentation from healthcare providers to support claims of functional limitations.
- Engage in Advocacy:
- Participate in the public comment period to voice concerns or suggest improvements to the proposed changes.
- Collaborate with veteran advocacy organizations to ensure widespread representation of veteran needs.
- Seek Professional Assistance:
- Consult VA-accredited representatives or legal experts to evaluate the potential impact on your disability rating.
- Prepare for potential appeals by gathering comprehensive evidence.
How to Submit Feedback on the Proposal
Veterans can contribute feedback during the public comment period. Visit this link to submit comments, concerns, and view other submissions. Engaging in this process ensures that veteran voices are heard and that the final rules are fair and equitable.
Final Thoughts
The VA’s proposed changes to neurological and convulsive disorder ratings represent a step toward modernizing disability evaluations. While these updates promise improvements in accuracy and fairness, veterans must remain proactive to protect their benefits. By staying informed, gathering evidence, and seeking professional guidance, veterans can navigate these changes and ensure their needs are met.
As always, we encourage our readers to review the VA’s proposals for themselves. This way you can draw your own conclusions and take whatever steps you deem necessary to best protect your disability benefits.
So if I’m at 100% permanent disabled will it change my disability. Or will it change my migraine % rate .
My husband, John Alexander passed away August 5, 2024. He had a previous claim submitted in March 2020. I receive correspondence from the VA that this claim was processed incorrectly.. I have applied for VA surviving spouse benefits, married for 46 years. Do the changes being made affect my surviving spouse claim? I am still waiting for information and it is now the middle of February, 2025! Is there anything the VA requires from me since my husband passed in August 2024?
Are there any changes for wife of a deceased veteran who was 100 percent disabled. I do have Champ VA
Champva medical is a great benefit. You should contact a VSO and ask them to fill you in.
I am the wife of a retired veteran with zero compensation, and the mother-in-law of a 100% disabled veteran with a progressive neurological condition. The 100% disabled veteran has without success been able to get his 7 month old daughter added as his dependent for the health care benefit. All paperwork had been completed and submitted. In addition upon inquiring about this matter he receives the same response, we’re working on it What can he or we do to help him receive guidance and help on this matter?
If we are already 100P&T and conditions are static including migraines are we grandfathered in? I’m at 30% for migraines.
Does this mean that they are going to reevaluate veterans currently rated with the above disabilities and change their rating?
I am the same. Would like to know too.
I am spouse of a 100 percent disabled veteran I am unaware of any benefits for spouse’s accept for life insurance benefits and possible small pension. Would like more information about any other benefits that I might qualify for. I do have Tricare for life and Medicare.
Va is already denying claims saying no formal diagnosis. For conditions that have multiple doctors diagnosing to include va doctors/clinicians. So more medical evidence to prove claims than is already needed when the veterans are already being overburdened by the current incompetence of the examiners.